CubaUs first direct national election by Ann Schneider Close to 8 million Cubans cast their ballots in the first direct elections for the Provincial and National Assemblies, on February 24th, 1993. The date marked the 98th anniversary of the beginning of their first War for Independence from Spain. While there were no contested races, the elections were a democratic advance from the prior system where national and provincial leadership were elected by the municipal assemblies. For the first time, Cuban President and Commander-in- Chief Fidel Castro contested for the popular vote, running for Deputy to the National Assembly from the 7th electoral district in Santiago de Cuba. Granma, the official organ of the Cuban Communist Party, reported on February 25th that both Fidel and his brother Raul Castro, General of the Cuban Army, received RyesS votes from 99 percent of the eligible voters in their districts. Voting is not mandatory in Cuba, and anyone age 16 or older who has not been convicted of a serious crime has the right to vote. However, because balloting was done at the offices of the local Committees for the Defense of the Revolution (CDRs), there was social pressure on election day. Every polling place provided a private, curtained booth for voters to mark their ballots. Between February 8th and 23rd, the U.S.-funded, Miami- based Radio Marti station broadcast, more than a thousand times, an explicit message urging Cubans to express dissent by defacing their ballots or leaving them blank. However, CubaUs Radio Havana, on February 26th, reported that only 7.2 percent of the ballots cast were spoiled or blank. The voter turnout was 99.6 percent, and all national candidates were approved by at least 85 percent of the electorate. Because ballots only presented a single name for each available seat, the February 24th Cuban election objectively can be considered as no more than a referendum on the course of the revolution. The landmark Cuban feature of the election, a form of direct democracy, was the method for choosing the candidate whose name appeared on the ballots. It paralleled the procedure, used in Cuba since 1972, to select delegates to the Municipal Assemblies. Open town-hall type meetings were held in each neighborhood to single out peopleUs representatives whom the community felt were responsible, ethical and good problem- solvers. Under the new electoral law, included in the constitutional revisions of July 1992, the system was expanded to provide a pool of candidates from which most national and provincial representatives were to be drawn. Also, to make sure that all sectors of society were represented in the nominating process, Candidacy Commissions were created, composed of members from every mass organization: the Confederation of Trade Unions, the CDRUs, the Federation of Cuban Women, the Student Unions and the Alliance of Small Farmers. These commissions, one for each level of office, were charged with the duty of consulting local community leaders, social and professional organizations, and the major workplaces for recommendations and comments on proposed candidates. Finally, each Commission submitted a slate to the Municipal Assembly, which negotiated and chose the best qualified candidate to be named for each position on the ballot. The Municipal Assemblies were chosen in prior contested elections, the most recent on December 20, 1992 when 28,000 candidates ran for 13,865 seats. Voter turnout for that election was 97 percent, some 15 percent greater than expected. In 433 precincts where no candidate won a majority, run-off elections were held on December 27th. Up to half of the Municipal Assembly Delegates elected in December may also be candidates for one of the higher bodies. However, under the new law, the remaining 50 percent of candidates must be nominated by Candidacy Commissions from outside the municipal assemblies. As a result of this reform, the upper bodies now contain fewer professionals and proportionately more youth, tradespeople, and sports and cultural figures. In addition, 11 journalists and two pastors were elected to the 589-seat National Assembly. The National Assembly and the Provincial Assembly, which has 1,190 seats, have five year terms. The Municipal Assembly Delegates serve for two and a half years. At all levels, the elected officials are required to report regularly to their constituencies, and all are subject to recall for misfeasance or nonfeasance. The Communist Party does not directly participate in the elections. It is the institutions of PeopleUs Power P the mass organizations and individuals P who nominate and elect. No more than 45 of the 589 Deputies elected on February 24th to the National Assembly are Communist Party cadres; a similar number are members of the Communist Youth League, the organization reserved for persons under age 30 P those born after the revolution. Campaigning in Cuban elections is very limited. What took place was designed to acquaint the people with the candidates, 85 percent of whom were not incumbents and, therefore, not necessarily well-known. Posters of each candidate, displaying a photograph, home address, birthdate and biographical information (such as work history, educational level and organizational affiliation) were displayed in the windows of each CDR hall. There were no statements or political positions. The biographies were written in the third person. Also appearing in the window was a sample ballot with simple voting instructions. People were told they had the right to vote for one, some, none, or all of the candidates on the ballot; and that candidates, to be elected, had to receive approval by more than 50 percent of the voters their districts. Write-ins were not permitted. If a nominated candidate failed to receive at least 50 percent of the votes, the municipal assemblies were required to nominate a second, perhaps less well- qualified, candidate and to hold a later round of elections. No known dissidents sought nomination, according to Reuters news service and other sources, but there is disagreement as to whether dissidents were harassed or whether they simply stayed away because they know they could not win in a popular vote. While voters had the right not to vote for a candidate, straight-ticket voting was highly encouraged by an election slogan that appeared everywhere, RTodos son sus candidatosS (All are your candidates). Fidel, the weekend before the election, handwrote a message for all Cubans that was carried by both Granma and Juventud Rebelde, the youth paper. He called for a united vote, not just as a slogan but as a revolutionary strategy. In his words, ROur election under creative new methods, more democratic than have ever been employed anywhere in the world, form part of the great struggle of the Tspecial periodU in which our people fight heroically for the survival of the values that we love.S His reference was to the collapse of the Soviet Union and its loss as a trading partner. Cuba chose to hold a popular election at a time when imports are 25 percent of their pre-l990 level, and public transportation has shrunk to one-third of its normal level, leaving Cubans waiting for hours to squeeze on a bus. It was a testamonial to the faith CubaUs leaders have in their people and it affirms their defiance of the U.S. embargo. o Ann M. Schneider is a New York.City member of the National Lawyers Guild.