|
|
<< Join the Labor Movement- TODAY | Main | And now Colombia? >> October 26, 2003Underfunded Pensions? Fund them Less!Pensions among Standard & Poor's 500 companies are estimated to be underfunded by $247 billion-- a rise of 10% from $225-billion in 2002. The US government is largely on hook for these deficits if any companies go bankrupt. So you'd think the solution would be to require companies to increase funding of their pension systems. Well you'd be wrong. Instead, bowing to corporate lobbying, the House has already passed legislation to REDUCE the minimum pension contributions for the next two years- increasing the underfunding of pensions by $18 billion this year alone. Bush has said he supports the measure and the Senate is set to vote on the measure. Now, there was bipartisan support for the measure, because of fears that companies will just default on pensions given the economic burden of these underfunded pensions-- but this is all just part of the short-term crisis management that has become the hallmark of this administration's economic policy. Posted by Nathan at October 26, 2003 06:40 PM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThis unfunded liability is, in part, an overhang from the stock market bubble, as inflated asset values led companies to effectively undercontribute to pension funds, as, in fact, they were required to undercontribute by law. Real reform would correct this defect in pension rules, but, of course, the trend is to attempt to eliminate defined benefit plans in favor of "market-based" plans that would transfer risk onto workers, even as the assault on Social Security continues... Posted by: John c. halasz at October 26, 2003 10:47 PM I agree with John on this except for the Social Security assault. SS reform is dead in the water. The only people who will be assaulting SS within the next 10 years will be baby-boomers asking for their $1000 checks every month. Posted by: Chad Peterson at October 28, 2003 02:00 PM Am I the only one who things that pension funds should be legally required to be full reserve? How many corporations have collapsed into disarray, leaving workers penniless after a lifetime while CEO and other acronyms walk away with millions? If an entity with the multitrillion-dollar resources of the US government can't run this scheme, what makes them think they can? Nobody learns. Posted by: Dominick at October 30, 2003 09:45 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|