|
|
<< Have They No Shame? | Main | Wal-Mart the Lawbreaker >> October 29, 2003Bush DOL Violating NAFTA ObligationsThe federal Court of International Trade-- the special court dealing with trade matters-- has blasted the Bush administration's Department of Labor for routinely violating the law in failing to investigate and grant trade adjustment funds to workers losing their job due to jobs being moved to Mexico. These funds are a critical part of the Trade Assistance Act that was used to justify NAFTA on the theory that workers who lose out under "free trade" would at least be compensated with the funds needed to train for new careers. But the Court is outraged that workers routinely have to appeal to the courts for help, as the DOL routinely ignores their requests for aid: While this case is troubling enough when viewed in isolation, it is even more troubling if it is viewed in the context of other TAA and NAFTA-TAA cases appealed to this Court...There is something fundamentally wrong with the administration of the nation’s trade adjustment assistance programs if, as a practical matter, workers often must appeal their cases to the courts to secure the thorough investigation that the Labor Department is obligated to conduct by law.In this case, Ameriphone employees were responsible for inspecting, testing, repairing, and modifying communications technology produced in China and used by the hearing-impaired, deaf, and special needs communities. Ameriphone was purchased by Plantronics in 2002, and much of the work performed by Ameriphone employees in California was shifted to a Plantronics plant in Tijuana, Mexico. The DOL refused to certify them as qualifying for trade assistance, forcing them to appeal to the Trade Court. Even as the Bush administration is trying to negotiate new trade deals, it is blatantly violating its obligations to workers who have lost out due to NAFTA. If the administration can't enforce the few pathetic pro-worker provisions of NAFTA, they should be blocked from moving forward on any new trade deals. Posted by Nathan at October 29, 2003 09:00 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsMainstream neo-classical economists like to claim the government regulation is liable to be ineffective or worse, because government regulators are susceptible to being "captured" by the interests they regulate. Then why is it that government labor laws have not been "captured" by the interests of labor? Posted by: john c. halasz at October 29, 2003 09:53 PM NAFTA has taken the American Dream! Almost everyone I know has lost their jobs due to the companies moving to Mexico and China. Alot of these people are getting older and can't find new work. This is so sad for the American People yet nothing is being done about it. Its really killing small town USA! But yet it seems it goes over looked like it doesn't matter. America needs to help its own people and get this straightened out! Its sad when an American loses work because companies are so greety that they take their work out of the country for cheaper labor and you can't tell me that this is NOT what NAFTA is about for these companies! My Prayers go out to all the families that have lost their jobs and can't buy groceries or pay their bills because their company wanted to save some cash by going out of the country! .. ... Very angry In USA Posted by: Barbara at December 9, 2003 06:44 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|