|
<< Making Defense Dept a Patronage Machine | Main | CA Businesses: Repeal Workers Rights Law >> February 09, 2004Journalists Views on Trade to Change?You've got to wonder if this will shift some reporters' views on trade away from their usual knee-jerk "free trade" position: Reuters is going a step further. It told its editorial employees in an electronic posting late last week that it planned to hire six journalists in Bangalore, India, to do basic financial reporting on 3,000 small to medium-size American companies...As outsourcing penetrates all white collar professions, the politics of trade are going to get more interesting and complicated in workplace discussions throughout the economy-- including apparently in newsrooms as well.
Posted by Nathan at February 9, 2004 08:07 PM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsHopefully some of the more vocal proponents will see their jobs shift. Posted by: Steve C at February 10, 2004 08:20 AM i think you misunderstand whose jobs are shifting . these are NOT journalists . reuters ( since aquiring multex is now one of the major source of financial data on public listed companies . the jobs are really data entry from SEC ( and it's european counterparts ) and creating a financial profile . for example if you go to yahoo financial and look at any US company the data are from reuters financial ( what use to be multex ) . it is not all that different from other back office outsourcing . not at this stage any way . this is not to comment on outsourcing per say . just a clarification. Posted by: badri at February 10, 2004 09:45 AM badri, Posted by: SteveC at February 10, 2004 11:52 AM Moving even a small chunk of the reporting work to Bangalore is significant from the journalists' point of view for two reasons: 1) It almost certainly destroys the classic journalistic career progression of research --> scutwork reporter --> full-fledged reporter. (That progression had been becoming rarer anyway, but this kind of arrangement makes it virtually impossible.) 2) It could erect even more of a wall between the people who crunch the numbers and think about their nitty-gritty implications and the people who talk to the CEOs, marketers and other spinners -- a generally more corporation-friendly situation, and less conducive to real reporting. Posted by: paul at February 11, 2004 10:37 AM "Only low level jobs are being outsourced offshore" is nonsense. Whether it is a high level or a low level job it is one more American deprived of an income and not paying (or paying lower) local, state, and federal taxes. The jobs being created pay less and have lower to no benefits. It is one more American family at risk for publicly funded healthcare and safety nets. Free Trade and Globalization are good for the U.S. Economy now but the derived wealth is unevenly distributed and in the long run will gut the middle class creating a vast slum of the super rich and the pitiful poor who serve them. Posted by: Jim at February 12, 2004 09:34 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|