|
<< Labor Roundup | Main | Losing A Job To Highlight Reality >> April 22, 2004Beating Back Anti-Immigrant PrejudiceA big sigh of relief. The members of the Sierra Club have decisively rejected leadership candidates who were campaigning to convert the Sierra Club into an anti-immigrant organization. This same fight happened a few years ago, but the anti-immigrant forces had more prominent candidates this time, including former Colorado Governor Richard Lamm. There is a NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) form of environmentalism that sees new immigrants as a threat to the environment, due to growth pressures. But any reasonable view of the global environment has to recognize that more people in one place is less pressure on the environment somewhere else-- so it's not immigration but overall use of resources wherever people live that matters for environmental preservation. There are many areas of the US-- sprawling low-density suburbs especially-- that could improve the environment with more growth targetted at "infilling" those areas to encourage more use of mass transit. Growth in many areas, properly managed, can easily be a net plus for the environment. It can potentially repair the environmental disaster that sprawl has created in so many areas of the United States. Posted by Nathan at April 22, 2004 07:48 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThank God! I'd voted for the mainstream (i.e. not the anti-immigrant) slate, and got my friends who were into the club to do so, but didn't know how it turned out. As I explained to others, regardless of how they felt about immigration, the Sierra Club is the wrong organization to pursue those goals. It would tar the environmental movement with a racist brush, making it harder to form coalitions and achieve goals far more important than anything to do with immigration. Posted by: Kevin Block-Schwenk at April 23, 2004 12:12 AM the fact that this was even an issue reflects badly on the sierra club. what this means is that anti-immigrant sentiment is much higher in the sierra club than almost any other significant policy group including the republican party. if the sierra club is to regain grace a major purge is in order. Posted by: 2pik at April 23, 2004 12:56 AM 2pik- "Regain grace"? What are you talking about? Sierra Club members decisively rejected anti-immigrant policies, where those anti-immigrant candidates received less than 10% of the votes cast. That vote is a testament to the progressivism of Sierra Club members who, in an atmosphere of anti-immigrant hysteria, have rejected prejudice. "Purges" are for authoritarian states not open membership groups like the Sierra Club. The point of democracy is that you win through education and voting, not "purging." Posted by: Nathan Newman at April 23, 2004 06:49 AM 2pic, Unlike corporations and some other groups, The Sierra Club is a democratic organization. Anybody can collect a relatively small number of signatures in order to secure himself a place on the ballot. This is now the "antis" got on the ballot. The Sierra Club also has an official nominating committee, which did not nominate any of the anti-immigrant people. Saying that the presense of anti-immigration types on the ballot reflects badly on the Sierra Club is like saying that the presence of Lyndon LaRouche on the ballot reflects badly on the Democratic Party. They didn't put him there, but the rules are the rules. Posted by: Kevin Block-Schwenk at April 23, 2004 11:24 AM 2pik, his real name I'm sure (descended from the 2pik branch of the Hapsburgs), lives in an alternate universe where groups like the Sierra Club need purges and no@mail.com is a working email address. Posted by: Kathryn Cramer at April 23, 2004 02:35 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|