|
|
<< Rightwing on Me and WWP | Main | Comment Problems >> May 21, 2004Wages Lag, Bush Approval DropsTo the chagrin of some Bush boosters, recent GDP and job numbers aren't boosting approval of Bush's handling of the economy. In fact, it's been dropping with a recent poll showing 60% of the population disapproving of his economic management. Which might be explained by the fact that anemic job growth is matched by stagnant wages for everyone else. Check the wage analysis factoids: The kicker of all this is that corporate America is doing phenomenally well: So note this, not only were the rich getting their taxes cut, but the total income they were earning was expanding rapidly. But the GOP still thinks the wealthy need new tax cuts. Maybe they shouldn't be surprised that the rest of the population thinks they deserve a raise as well-- and see Bush as not delivering the goods for anyone other than his rich buddies. Posted by Nathan at May 21, 2004 08:46 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments"Adjusted for inflation, average hourly wages for non-farm workers, excluding managers and executives, rose 25 cents, to $15.35, between 2001 and 2003. That equates to an annual increase of less than 2 percent, or below the rate of inflation." I'm not sure what the final clause here is trying to say. After all, in terms of a worker's financial situation, an inflation rate of 3% is the same as an inflation rate of 30%, as long as real income rises at the same rate. So, the author of this article is comparing two statistics that have absolutely no relation to one another. More on my blog. Posted by: Byrne at May 23, 2004 11:12 AM Personally, I think the time is about right to show'em some REAL class warfare. While we can still afford ammo. Posted by: Jeff Lawson at May 24, 2004 02:53 AM
Posted by: Ruester at May 24, 2004 06:07 AM Do you usually quote idiocy Nathan? Adjusted for inflation, average hourly wages for non-farm workers, excluding managers and executives, rose 25 cents, to $15.35, between 2001 and 2003. That equates to an annual increase of less than 2 percent, or below the rate of inflation. If the wages are adjusted for inflation they cannot be below the rate of inflation. Posted by: Steve at May 26, 2004 02:37 PM Join the Linux community. Linuxwaves.net Posted by: Catherine at July 6, 2004 11:31 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|