|
<< Bush Flip-Flops on Health Law | Main | SEIU's Stern Blasts AFL-CIO >> June 22, 2004Inequality Kills YouWhen folks feel oppressed in the workplace, they often have the fantasy that at least the top dogs in a firm are paying for their financial success with ulcers from the stress and responsibility of running the show. Turns out-- not so much. In fact, inequality in status leads to higher stress for those with less power and status, so argues a new book, Status Syndrome: How Your Social Standing Directly Affects Your Health and Life Expectancy. The book extends research Michael Marmot did on British hierarchies in the workplace: Marmot led the landmark "Whitehall study", which followed the health of British civil servants and their job grades from the 1970s onwards. It showed that those at the bottom of the organisational pile - the clerks and the messengers - were much more likely to suffer coronary heart disease than the mandarins at the top.So those with less power not only make less money, so (especially in the US) have less access to good health care, they also suffer more stress that increases major causes of ill health. Because of Thatcherism, the spread in life span in Britain between the poor and wealthy increased: For example, the difference in life expectancy in the UK between the highest and lowest social classes jumped from about 5.5 years in the 1970s to 9.5 years by the 1990s, after years of Thatcherite government policies.The argument in the book is that those who worry just about material gain overall, without worry about how inequality shapes personal experiences, is missing profound issues in human desires: The answer, Marmot said in an interview from London, lies in the psychological effects of inequality: "Your position in the hierarchy very much relates to how much control you have over your life and your opportunities for full social engagement." Those feelings, he and others argue, profoundly affect one's health.Much as conservatives hate to hear the message, the argument is that equality, in and of itself, is good for human health and happiness. More material goodies aren't enough; we need to feel that we have control of our lives and some equality of status compared to our peers. Posted by Nathan at June 22, 2004 09:10 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsI seem to recall earlier studies that suggested that stress was to a large extent dependent on control - those with the least control over their lives had the most stress. Posted by: chris bond at June 22, 2004 02:01 PM I seem to recall earlier studies that suggested that stress was to a large extent dependent on control - those with the least control over their lives had the most stress. Posted by: chris bond at June 22, 2004 02:01 PM "Oh happy low, lay your heads down! Uneasy lies the head that wears the crown!" The ruling class is always keen to have the masses think they pay for their privilege with stress over the terrible, terrible burden of keeping society progressive and safe. Basically they want people to think they work hard enough to justify their outrageous fortunes, and this would terrify any working person who is stretched to the limit and beyond by the demands of their dead-end jobs. What heros they must be in the Inner Party, just to survive their awesome responsibility. This is why I believe in democracy. If only a ruling elite ever delivered on the promise of wise, enlightened leadership, surely we'd all agree to be carefree serfs. But even in the Middle Ages no one really bought this bull, not about someone they could see every day gouging for rents, rigging trials for their sycophants, and stuffing their faces with the sweat of the plowman's brow. That's why reverence had to be kicked upstairs to the lofty level of monarchy as Shakespeare was doing. Nope, no one will fight for you but you and your friends. Hence democracy as the only solution. Posted by: Mark at June 25, 2004 03:58 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|