|
|
<< Kuwait Bans "Fahrenheit 9/11" | Main | A Wal-Mart Unionizes (in Canada) >> August 02, 2004The Bush DepressionThe only saying goes, it's a recession when your neighbor loses their job; it's a depression when you lose it. By the most recent analysis, a lot of people were depressed by Bush, losing their jobs at a rate only matched by the early Reagan years. In the first three years of the Bush Presidency, 8.7 percent of all adult jobholders, or 11.4 million men and women age 20 or older, permanently lost their jobs-- nearly equal to the 9% who lost their jobs in the first three years of Reagan. It's been hard to get a definitive statistic to summarize why the Bush recession-- despite the softer GDP-style measures-- was experienced by the population as so bad. This seems to be it. And while many of those who lost their jobs evenutally found a new one, the same study found that 56.9 percent of those re-employed were earning less in their new jobs than in the jobs they had lost. Oh, and one more kicker from the survey. Those getting laid off were not just part of the usual churn of young or poorer folks cycling from job to job. A large number-- in fact, 5.3 million or 6.3% of everyone who had held a job for three years or more, lost their jobs during Bush's tenure-- a precentage actually higher than the rate for long-term employees during Reagan's first three years. Posted by Nathan at August 2, 2004 07:34 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsFrom the story: ""It appears there is more displacement now; this latest number is quite high," said Henry S. Farber, a Princeton University labor economist who has challenged the anecdotal evidence, wondering whether it overstated the case." Save us from the academic economists, they have no conception of the "real world" and what average workers face in the age of globalizaion. They are completely clueless. In the age of the internet, I don't think it will be long before someone in a low wage country will be teaching their classes, it can't happen to soon for me. Posted by: SlcInCny at August 2, 2004 09:50 AM Some of us in the tech industry lost our job twice. :o) My new job is at Amazon, so hopefully it's a bit more stable. Posted by: Jefe Le Gran at August 2, 2004 12:28 PM I can't find this story on today's nytimes site, though I can get to it via the link above. What gives? Posted by: camille roy at August 2, 2004 01:46 PM Three cheers for supply-side economics! Posted by: Doug at August 2, 2004 08:12 PM Come on, now, the Bush economy has its Posted by: Ruester at August 3, 2004 12:53 AM Interesting. But is it the Bush depression, in the sense that Bush's activities have made it so bad? Certainly it's happened on his watch and he'll have to shoulder the blame for it. But why is it happening so badly? Posted by: MFB at August 3, 2004 05:25 AM And then there are self-employed people who didn't really lose their jobs, but whose incomes have gone down dramatically because their clients lost theirs, or are cutting back on expenses. Free-lance graphic designers. Web developers. Cab drivers. Even lawyers. Then there are people in the service industries who haven't been fired but whose hours have been cut dramatically back. I recently went to a concert at Madison Square Garden. They don't have enough security or staff to adequately work the room. None of them lost their jobs completely, but they don't work as often. I work for a university that closed its cafeteria for the summer. Hopefully, the staff who worked there will be able to come back this fall. In the meantime, they are being asked to live on unemployment benefits, which can't possibly be covering their expenses. Posted by: Brooklyn Girl at August 3, 2004 01:30 PM As a business owner in manufacturing I can’t find good/qualified help in my engineering department. Posted by: Karl at August 18, 2004 06:54 PM Oh, poor Karl. If you can't find qualified help, take on someone unqualified and train them. Obviously if nobody hires inexperienced workers, eventually there won't be any experienced workers left, as all the old ones die off. If you don't need the help badly enough to do that, then you don't have a very convincing argument for jobs being available. And it is the economy's fault that people can't find jobs. Basic capitalist supply and demand - employment will be at the equilibrium point, which requires a certain percentage of unemployment. Posted by: felice at August 19, 2004 09:07 PM People that go to school to learn engineering should at the minimum know engineering. I don’t think that should be too much to ask. That would make them qualified but not experienced. Salary $39,500 annually Posted by: Karl at August 21, 2004 03:42 PM just testing plz dont mind Posted by: sam at September 8, 2004 05:59 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|