|
|
<< Racism 101 for the Unconvinced | Main | More Delong and Global Visions >> July 29, 2002Where's Right on Paid Leave?With strong approval by a legislative committee, the California state legislature will soon vote on mandating 12 weeks of paid leave for new mothers and others facing family emergencies. Yet supposedly pro-family conservatives in the GOP are opposing the bill. It seems that the Right is always trying to prove the old caricature of themselves as being pro-life only until birth. Although notably, the Catholic Church activists are the only pro-lifers loudly in the forefront of also supporting paid family leave, just as they opposed the religious right's attacks on welfare in California earlier in the decade. It is this hypocrisy by the religious right that explains why they could never build a real alliance to the Catholic pro-lifers. Posted by Nathan at July 29, 2002 03:38 PM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThink about it. If this law passes that means money will be going back into the pockets of lower class people. Can't have that now can we? Instead they oppose it because it means that there will be more money in the government coffers to raid for bailing out corporate criminals and crooked Republicans. Posted by: Les Dabney at July 29, 2002 08:17 PM Yet it's a mistake to just lump the religious conservatives in with the corporate elite-- there is an alliance and there are issues where the desire for corporate profit should conflict with the pro-family beliefs of deeply religious people. The far more independent Catholic activists reflect this and it is interesting how much the evangelical right has let their own agenda get subordinated to their corporate allies Posted by: Nathan Newman at July 29, 2002 08:28 PM Here's a possible rationalization: The acid test for this would probably have something to do with welfare reform--by this standard sending mothers out to work is a bad idea. Maybe welfare mothers count as fallen women whose children should be in orphanages, I don't know. (As you can tell, trying to be sympathetic to the religious conservatives' point of view is a strain.) Frankly, Nathan, I'm more inclined to your point of view--the evangelical right is letting its agenda get set by fat cats. I think there is some overlap though: Remember Mr. Lay saying "I believe in God and I believe in free markets"? Sometimes I think that the right wing sees riches as a sign of divine favor, as in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (IIRC). Posted by: Matt Weiner at July 30, 2002 10:55 AM pissing Posted by: som at August 24, 2004 04:26 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|