|
|
<< More on Productivity Slipperiness | Main | "New Gore" on a Roll >> November 21, 2002Why Single Payer is Better Health CareNow that Gore has put single payer health care on the table, conservatives will be coming out of the woodwork to argue why Canada and Britain show that government-run health care will lead to shortages and long lines. What they won't mention is France and for good reason. One thing rarely mentioned is that both Canada and Britain spend a far smaller percentage of their national GDP on health care, and far, far less per person on health care. Notably, while this leads to some tough HMO-style restrictions, their health care results are actually better than the US when you look at mortality numbers.
"By any measure, France's health service is among the best in the world. Life expectancy for women (despite a collective reluctance to stop smoking) is second only to Japan, and the men are not far behind (despite, or because of, a continuing love of wine). There are no waiting lists for hospital treatment; general practitioners are prepared to make home visits, even at night and during the weekend; and the poor get their treatment free. For the rest of the population, the cost is almost, or entirely, covered by a combination of the state's social-security system and co-operative insurance bodies known as mutuelles. Not surprisingly, the French visit their doctors at the first sniff of a cold, go into hospital more often than others, and swallow more pills than anyone except the Japanese." Sounds damn good doesn't it, especially since they spend only 10% of GDP on health care, while the US spends over 13%. France has a far more quickly aging population, so the article raises alarms, but France would have to increase costs 30% to appoach the costs in the United States. So don't let those attacking universal health care point to Canada or Britain without forcing them to deal with the fact that the US spends almost twice as large a percentage of GDP on health care as Britain and almost 50% more than Canada. Posted by Nathan at November 21, 2002 09:48 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsGood point. One quibble: the graph on the left makes it look like France spends about 9 or 9.5% of GDP on health care, not 10% as you say. It certainly doesn't look like they're spending very much more than Canada's 9.3% - if that graph is accurate. Posted by: Ampersand at November 25, 2002 09:24 AM pissing Posted by: som at August 24, 2004 04:52 AM pissing Posted by: roma at August 24, 2004 05:06 AM of still we comes. Posted by: russian incest at September 6, 2004 03:29 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|