|
<< Why Legislative Prayer Should End | Main | Backfire of "Anti-Latino" Line on Estrada Filibuster >> March 09, 2003Blair Faces Revolt/Resignations on IraqSee this UK report: Military action could result in the rebellion of up to 200 MPs and the resignation of as many as ten members of Mr Blair's Government, according to a straw poll in Westminster.There are 412 Labour members of parliament. If accurate, this report means that Blair may be approaching numbers where he could be dumped from office. Update: The first top Cabinet minister in Blair's cabinet, Clair Short of the International Development portfolio, announced her likely resignation: CLARE SHORT dealt a body blow to Tony Blair last night by declaring that she would resign from the Government if he failed to secure United Nations backing for war against Iraq. Posted by Nathan at March 9, 2003 08:29 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsYeah, that means 200 Labour MPs, plus about fifty Liberal Democrats (or just about all of them). Just about all the Tories support Blair (with some big exceptions). Posted by: John Isbell at March 9, 2003 04:36 PM I should say: or if Blair backs down. People often do that in a tight spot. Posted by: John Isbell at March 9, 2003 04:37 PM The crisis moment comes when Blair decides to go to war without a new UN Security Council resolution. For months now the path of least resistance for Labour MPs has been to say they won't countenance military action against Iraq without "a second resolution". This has allowed them to save face with both sides: to the Prime Minister and other pro-war forces they can say that they accept the principle of military action but that their internationalist commitments require them to "go through the UN"; to antiwar people in parliament and their constituency parties, they can say that the only military action they might conceivably endorse is that sanctioned by the United Nations. If Blair gets his UN resolution, most Labour MPs -- whatever they privately think of the war -- will go along with the Bush onslaught. It's if he doesn't that things get interesting, as then all the Labour MPs who have parroted the "no military force without UN authorisation" line will have to either kick their Prime Minister in the teeth or to fall meekly into line. If lots take the first alternative, then Blair becomes very vulnerable. Some will no doubt move each way -- but the good news today is that Andy Reed has resigned as parliamentary bag-carrier to Margaret Beckett, a senior minister, which is the first opening in the Government's armour... Posted by: Chris Brooke at March 9, 2003 06:43 PM Next up, Robin Cook? Posted by: Tom Runnacles at March 9, 2003 10:11 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|