|
<< Will Bustamante Take Over? | Main | Good News on Child Health Insurance >> July 31, 2003Why School Testing is Evil"No Child Left Behind" (or as a reporter friend called it, "No Child Gets Out Alive") establishes the principle of collective punishment-- if enough people fail at a school, the whole school gets punished with the threat of losing aid and essentially being destroyed. The idea is that this will make schools help the most underperforming students, but there's a simpler solution. Get rid of bad students. Which is what is happening in New York. Growing numbers of students --most of them struggling academically -- are being pushed out of New York City's school system and classified under bureaucratic categories that hide their failure to graduate.This is treated as an unexpected problem, but testing has been leading to this problem for years. In fact, at least one major Hollywood film was built around this problem. The Christian Slater film, PUMP UP THE VOLUME, was partly about teens rebelling against a school principal who was systematically weeding out "bad" students to increase her test score results. What high-stakes testing means is that schools will automatically cultivate hostility to poor performing students and focus on making their schools as attractive to high-testing students-- a pretty perverse result of a school meant to help the students who really need help. But like most "compassionate conservative" initiatives, it's a program that sounds good on the surface but really is an assault on those who it is supposedly there to help. Posted by Nathan at July 31, 2003 07:44 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsNathan, I completely agree, testing as currently consituted is evil. And the main problem with schools is lack of money. But there is something real addressed by the testing movement. There does need to be someway to measure whether schools are doing a decent job or not. Any thoughts on what a reasonable way to do this is? Posted by: Gar Lipow at July 31, 2003 01:28 PM Gar, how about low-stakes testing? Have the tests, and by all means take a close look at low-performing schools, but base decisions on the close look and not just on the raw statistics. This only works if the people at the local level have the political will to fire incompetent principals, weed out poor teachers, and change teaching methods that aren't working, but that's true of any solution. The perniciousness of "high-stakes testing" is that it pretends you can solve the educational system's problems from the top with some sort of simple mandate, which is absurd. Posted by: Steven desJardins at July 31, 2003 04:03 PM American cultures glorifies stupidity, and nowhere is that more apparent than in schools, Posted by: Andy English at July 31, 2003 08:17 PM Given that private schools aren't forced to keep poor and/or problem students, the unfairness of closing public schools with poor test results that do have to admit every student is plain to see. Posted by: David W. at August 1, 2003 12:50 PM Although I do agree that perhaps No Child Left Behind is choosing severe methods of "helping" I think sometimes bad kids need to be weeded out of schools, and I say this from personal experience. My former NYC public high school (name I will not mention) was an excellent school with a good reputation and a number of different kinds of people that got along very well. Suddenly the schools with the worst reputations began shutting down and my school began accepting these children that would bad-mouth students and adults alike (often saying racist and dispicable things). Kids like these didn't want to learn so I don't see why they should be left in my former school to influence other incoming students. Posted by: GA at August 2, 2003 10:42 PM So I'm not the only person that knows of that movie. I enjoyed it quite a bit (and actually picked it up on DVD a while back, as it was on sale for like 9 bucks). GA, that's most likely a problem with the school system too...those students probably had far less access to decent teachers/schools in elementary grades. If you don't develop good habits early on, you most likely never will. Posted by: JoeF at August 3, 2003 03:22 AM I am currently a student at Presque Isle High School in northern Maine. I hadn't really given much thought to this whole education mandate until recently. I had never thought i would be affected by it, since my graduating class got out of all the new regulations and tests. However, since the class below me has to take more required class, there are less electives for me to take. In a few years i don't want to be taking "elective physical education" or "human anatomy" to fill up my schedual. i want to take classes that i will care about, that will make me want to go to school. Also, there is no point in trying to make everyone's level of education equal, because it's not possible. They are expecting everyone to pass Algebra? That's a bit unrealistic to me. Some students will have to take it 2-3 times before they pass it...and by that time, they won't even care. A lot of the classes that i would be able to take in high school before college i will have to now take in college, which upsets me because i would have had the chance to take it in high school, but now i have to take time out of my college to take beginners classes and pay for them, which will make it all the more expensive. Posted by: Monique Pelletier at August 20, 2003 09:47 AM pissing Posted by: som at August 24, 2004 06:45 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|