|
|
<< Bush States Are Spending Hogs | Main | Jobs Lost During Bush "Jobs Tour" >> August 05, 2003Wolfowitz v. Turkish DemocracySince a military coup in the early 1980s (and repeatedly before that), the military in Turkey has exercised an antidemocratic hand against democratic leaders in that country. With little restraint, the military had overthrown elected governments and even institutionalized direct military power through a military council that could overrule democratic governments. Finally-- partly under pressure by the European Union that only democratic reforms would allow the country to join the EU, the Turkish parliament has stood up and passed reforms (a bit more here), curbing the power and democratizing the power of the military council, expanding freedom of assembly, protecting the minority rights of Kurdish citizens, and reforming the criminal justice system. Sounds like a good thing all around, yes? Well not according to the Defense Department's Paul Wolfowitz. Because the current Turkish government has Islamic leanings (although it is officially not religious), the US government favored a dictatorial military-dominated system over a democratic country. When the Iraq war came, the US openly indicated that the Turkish parliament should bow to military demands to support the war. According to the New York Post: The vote had many consequences. It increased tensions between the AKP and the military. It upset the U.S. government; Paul Wolfowitz of the Defense Department dubbed the decision a "big, big mistake."After all the rhetoric about democracy in Iraq, this hypocrisy by the United States in opposing democratic decision-making and reforms in Turkey will hardly go unnoticed in the Islamic world. That the US was openly urging the Turkish military to override democratic resistance to participating in the war-- that along puts a lie to Bush's claims that the war was about any ideal of promoting democracy. It's worth remembering that for all of the US rhetoric about Hussein oppressing his Kurdish population (which was real oppression), the United States has remained essentially silent for decades as its ally Turkey killed and oppressed its Kurdish minority, including mass killings, violations of civil liberties, banning use of the Kurdish language, and suppressing political parties associated with the Kurds. Why don't progressives believe that the Iraqi war was about promoting democracy and minority rights, rather than about oil and regional power for the US military? Because we can look next door at Turkey where that same Bush administration opposes the democratic values it professes to support in Iraq. Update: The summary has been modified to clarify that Wolfowitz's comment was about the original democratic conflict between the civilian and military leadership over the Iraq war. Posted by Nathan at August 5, 2003 08:02 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsYour synopsis seems to claim that Wolfowitz's remark was in response to the vote on reforms. Actually, Wolfowitz said that the vote to disallow US troops a base to overthrow Saddam was a "big mistake," not the vote limiting the military. Also, I think you need to cut Turkey a bit of slack about the Kurdish fighting. As even your reference notes, Turkey was responding to a civil war by the Kurds. The repressive tactics of the Turks also seem to be over-reported negatively - I know for a fact that the ban on Kurdish names was not particularly enforced. Also, since the capture of Ocalan - and the date of your reference - the fighting in the South East has entirely disappeared. Posted by: McDruid at August 6, 2003 04:12 AM I cleaned up the summary to be clearer, but the point about the Kurds ignores the fact that the same Kurds, often the same political and military groups, were fighting both the Iraqi and Turkish governments. If brutality was justified by the Turks, it would have been justified by Iraq. Posted by: Nathan at August 6, 2003 08:00 AM pissing Posted by: roma at August 24, 2004 07:01 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|