|
<< How Unions Make Democrats | Main | Poor in US- Poor in the World >> October 08, 2003Prop 54 Defeated- 64% RejectBy a resounding vote, California voted down Ward Connerly's "racial privacy" bill. Eliminating public information on race does not serve justice, but would be a way to kill data on the existing racism in education, health care and social services. No data, no problem-- it's an insidious strategy by conservatives to claim racism is all anecdotal, while making non-anecdotal data impossible to collect. Thankfully, the Californian public rejected this rightwing gambit. Posted by Nathan at October 8, 2003 10:30 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsI respectfully disagree with you, Nathan. While many rightwingers were indeed pushing this bill (and might be closet racists), I believe we'll all be better off when the government stops tracking and dividing us based on the color of our skin. Posted by: John Q. at October 8, 2003 10:34 AM More than any other issue in this election, I was concerned about this. As you said, if you can't count something, you can't determine if there is a problem. As for John Q, I too hope for a day when we will no longer count things by race, but we are clearly a long way away from the day that this might be prudent. Posted by: Benedict@Large at October 8, 2003 09:28 PM I think it's stupid to have all this initiatives. I love the way we are set up as states and everyone can experiment with doing things differently. I'd like to thank California for showing one Georgian that initiatives are dumb way to run a government. I think this is a stupid initiative as well and I would have voted against it. Posted by: Chad Peterson at October 10, 2003 02:35 PM What's pretty ironic is that the recall provision was put into place to serve as essentially a citizens' impeachment tool, to be used against public officials accused of corruption or criminal wrongdoing. Yet Californians have used it to recall a governor who has been accused of no such thing and replace him with a man who may be guilty of criminal wrongdoing. Go figure. Posted by: Laura in DC at October 10, 2003 09:13 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|