|
<< Kerry Dares GOP to Indict Clarke | Main | Can We Padlock FoxNews? >> March 28, 2004Why I Supported Medicare BillBush thought passing the Medicare Prescription Drug Bill would be a slamdunk for him politically-- a Clintonesque move of triangulation that would steal from the Democratic base. Instead, it's been a disaster, alientating conservatives with its costs and alienating many seniors with it's bait-and-switch provisions that seem to benefit drug companies more than seniors. And I was betting on this result when I advocated Dems supporting its passage. At this point, the Democratic criticisms have essentially won the public debate-- it's too much money going to drug companies, too little to seniors. So a new bill can be proposed that spends no new money, but reallocates the existing projected spending away from the subsidies to big corporations to expanding the benefits for seniors. That kind of bill is a slam-dunk politically and, assuming Kerry wins in the fall, even the GOP would have trouble filibustering it. But if the Medicare bill had never passed, can you really conceive of the GOP allowing a new $600 billion entitlement from passing? They would be crying about the deficit and accusing Kerry of promoting a "shadow tax" to sell everyone's first child into slavery to pay for it. It wouldn't have passed. So here's the reality-- we won the fight over the Medicare bill. There's still some struggles left, but Bush doesn't look to be getting any political bounce from it, and we have almost $600 billion new money allocated to Medicare and the principle that all seniors should have prescription drugs provided by Medicare. That's a much better position to organize from than before passage of the bill.
Posted by Nathan at March 28, 2004 07:40 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThe lesson is that if you're going to triangulate, you better do it right. Bush talked like a triangulator in the 2000 campaign, but his team is obviously just used to bullying people and refusing to compromise -- I don't think they're in their element when their trying to triangulate compromises. On the other hand, if things were going swimmingly with the economy or Iraq, as some in the Administration seemed to actually believe would be the case, most people would look the other way on the Medicare scandal. Posted by: Nick at March 29, 2004 10:54 AM Nathan: I am tempted to call you cynical. Now why would this be? Hum..... Posted by: Aimie at March 29, 2004 11:18 PM
Posted by: Paul at March 30, 2004 01:05 PM It does seem that you were right but do I detect a _bit_ of revision in your justification of the bill? In any case, I fear that the 'revolt of the seniors' might be a bit premature. They should be receiving their drug discount cards before the election- that could change their opinions of the plan somewhat (at least the ones who don't realize that they only get those cards for a year or so before the real plan kicks in) Posted by: Preston at March 31, 2004 05:32 PM for bush being a stupid chimp, he did a remarkably good job of 1) making dems think they had pulled one over on him, 2) getting health accounts started on the national front and 3) put a program on its last legs. did you guys not know he's a conservative, looking to starve the beast? it wasn't so much about triangulation, but changing how the gov't does business during and after his presidency. Posted by: a at April 3, 2004 12:01 AM there's One external reasonably. Posted by: incest sex at September 6, 2004 03:40 PM there's One external reasonably. Posted by: incest sex at September 6, 2004 03:42 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|