|
<< Rush Divorces | Main | Fraud of Social Security "Reform" >> June 12, 2004Welfare for Private Medicare CorpsAfter the chaos of the "discount" drug card, we are now seeing private Medicare insurers getting their extra subsidies-- quite a bit more per retiree than traditional Medicare recipients: On average, private insurers this year will receive at least 7 percent more than Medicare spends on the traditional fee-for-service program, several analysts estimate. That translates into an average of $552 per person for those enrolled in private Medicare plansBush and the GOP have to subsidize the private plans to make them viable competitors to traditional Medicare. Well, at least we liberals can take comfort in the admission by conservatives that capitalism can't compete with government-run services in a fair comparison. Posted by Nathan at June 12, 2004 09:40 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsDon Boudreaux catches Paul Krugman engaging in a bit of misleading history. Of course, that's sort of like reporting that ice is cold, but Boudreaux's post is interesting to read, nonetheless. Posted by: s at June 12, 2004 08:17 PM Krugman on Reagan Consider this statement of his in today’s New York Times: “Despite the rapid growth of 1983 and 1984, over the whole of the Reagan administration the unemployment rate averaged a very uncomfortable 7.5 percent.” The impression this statement gives is that, despite “rapid growth” in 1983 and 1984, unemployment rates were little affected – that these rates remained uncomfortably high throughout Reagan's presidency. Krugman gets away with this claim by lumping the high average annual unemployment rates of the early, pre-growth years of Reagan’s presidency (1981-82) with the rates of those years after the growth began (1983-89) – generating an average annual unemployment rate indeed of 7.5%. But look at the unemployment rates for each year from 1981 through 1988: 1981: 7.6% Several facts are worth noting. Here are some: 1) when Reagan left the White House, the unemployment rate was a full two percentage points lower than 7.5%; (To be even more precise, the unemployment rate had fallen even further, to 5.4%, in January 1989, the month Reagan really left the White House.) 2) for every year from 1983 through 1988, the annual unemployment rate fell; 3) a good case can be made (contra Krugman) for including 1983 (along with 1981 and 1982) in the pre-growth years; if you examine monthly unemployment rates, you find that unemployment didn’t really start to fall until July 1983, when for the first time in ten months it fell below 10%; 4) the significant flattening of federal income-tax rates enacted in 1986 immediately preceded significant reductions in unemployment rates. Posted by: s at June 12, 2004 08:19 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|