|
<< US Expects Trade Concessions from China | Main | Pottery Barn Denounces Powell >> April 20, 2004Bush Retreats on Overtime FightWe'll see what the final details look like, but Bush is revising his overtime proposal to guarantee overtime to more people and reduce those who will lose it compared to his initial proposal. One of the biggest changes is that the initial proposal would have denied overtime automatically to white collar workers making more than $65,000 per year-- knocking out extra pay for a range of middle class type folks. Instead, a worker would have to make $100,000 per year to automatically lose overtime pay. Another provision would guarantee that firefighters, police, EMS and other "first responders" could not lose overtime-- a clear response to Democratic criticisms of the initial proposal. So it looks like we have at least a partial victory here. We'll have to look at the details carefully, but this looks to be a big retreat by Bush. Karl Rove must have been worried about a bunch of folks out in the suburbs getting pissed when their overtime pay got slashed just before the election. Posted by Nathan at April 20, 2004 10:07 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThis has to still be seen as a loss for Bush. Those who would have lost their overtime but won't now have to understand that it was the Democrats who made it so. Also that if Bush gets a second term, espcially since he won't be worried about re-election there will be renewed attempts to pillage the middle class. Posted by: Boelf at April 20, 2004 11:31 AM How come nobody ever mentions the low-wage workers affected by this - retail supervisors and managers, who probably outnumber all the other categories combined? The original proposal extended the executive exemption to mere supervisors, and the revised version still abandons the "50%" duties test for executive employees. Posted by: whatta at April 20, 2004 08:25 PM I suppose it would be a waste of time to point out that none of these proposals would "deny overtime" to a single person; the proposals would just take people out of the category where the government forces their employers to give them overtime. Note further that being "Exempt" is not the unalloyed evil critics are trying to claim it is; it means that employers cannot deduct pay for missed time. Whereas the hourly employee can lose pay. Posted by: David Nieporent at April 24, 2004 08:48 PM Think simple. Learn different. Macinstruct.net Posted by: Lionel at July 6, 2004 09:06 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|