|
|
<< Losing A Job To Highlight Reality | Main | Dems are Better Catholics >> April 23, 2004Has Trade Overstated GDP?Look carefully at this graph from the Economist, which compares official GDP numbers with alternative measures of industrial production:
Note the sharp contrast between the supposed massive 8% GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2004 versus industrial production growth of less than 2% in the same quarter. The attached article notes the difference between industrial production and GDP numbers: Industrial-production figures are likely to be the more reliable of the two, because they come directly from industry reports. In contrast, goods-sector GDP is estimated indirectly by adding together final sales of goods, changes in inventories and net exports. If goods-sector GDP is replaced with the industrial-production series in estimating GDP, then the economy grew by only 2.2% in the year to the fourth quarter, not the reported 4.3%.Usually industrial production tracks GDP numbers pretty closely, but now we are seeing a divergence between GDP and industrial production-- and the anemic job situation which seems to reflect the industrial production numbers. One culprit is outsourcing-- not just the raw fact that jobs overseas are cutting employment in the US, but a statistical problem. Since internal shipments within firms, especially services done at a distance, don't always show up in trade figures, sales in the US reflecting that foreign labor may incorrectly imply higher production actually in the US: For example, when American firms outsource call-centre and information-technology-support jobs to India and other Asian countries, the result should be higher imports of services, yet official statistics do not show such an increase. America's recorded imports of software services from India are also much smaller than India's reported exports of such services to America.Job growth may be inching up but view all the "growth" numbers with suspicion until hiring is as strong as the hype. Posted by Nathan at April 23, 2004 07:53 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThat's a very interesting analysis. Thanks. Posted by: Kathryn Cramer at April 23, 2004 10:22 AM If we compare year over year money supply growth: 4.5% vs 6.5% for a similar period the year before, and take into account Krugman's cited 5% inflation that means that the economy shrank by 0.5%. This means that effectively once we factor into inflation, the economy is actually shrinking. This is consistent with your numbers, and indicates that we may have just come up for a breath of air before going under for a double drip recession when monetary policy is tightened later this year. Posted by: old guy at April 26, 2004 12:55 AM Receive information about the LOWEST mortgage rates possible! In 20 seconds-to-fill form you will be able to refinance mortgage even with Less-Than-Perfect-Credit. Posted by: Mortgage at September 6, 2004 04:08 PM Receive information about the LOWEST mortgage rates possible! In 20 seconds-to-fill form you will be able to refinance mortgage even with Less-Than-Perfect-Credit. Posted by: Mortgage at September 6, 2004 05:09 PM Receive information about the LOWEST mortgage rates possible! In 20 seconds-to-fill form you will be able to refinance mortgage even with Less-Than-Perfect-Credit. Posted by: Mortgage at September 6, 2004 07:46 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|