|
|
<< Right Tries "Labor Corruption" ploy | Main | Rightwing Watch (8-2) >> August 01, 2002So Will GOP Disown Simon?Oooh-- that's gotta hurt. You're running for governor of the most populous state in the country and a jury convicts your family firm of multi-million dollar fraud in the conduct of the business. The GOP is beating their breast that NJ's Torricelli should be replaced over the slightly sleazy gifts of a TV and some earings from a supporter. You wonder if they will be as outraged over a massive fraud verdict against their California gubernatorial candidate? Posted by Nathan at August 1, 2002 11:38 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsFrom tomorrow's HR: THE TORCH AND GRAY DAVIS are slimy promulgators of petty corruption. There "crimes," such as they are or are not, pale before the GOP as an institution: "The Senate ethics committee, reacting to a controversial document being assembled by Republican activists, plans to warn senators today not to use political affiliation as a basis for deciding who gets access to them or their staffs, a source familiar with the effort said last night. The committee's warning comes in response to a Washington Post report in June that Republicans were researching the party affiliation and campaign donations of hundreds of lobbyists, as a way to deny government access and jobs to those who don't share their political views. In what way is selling access to the institutions of government (in violation of the 1st Amendment's Right to Petition?) not far, far worse than the rinky dink scandals about which the blogosphere gets worked up? Posted by: Jeff at August 4, 2002 06:18 PM Although the Norquist/GOP project to screw liberal lobbyists is different from Torricelli's ethics violations. The problem with Torricelli is the idea that he might be favoring those who give him personal gifts at the expense of those who elected him. While if the GOP screws the liberals who didn't vote for them (or Dems do the reverse), that's largely what one expects people you elect to do against opposing forces. Yes, legislators should listen to all sides of an issue, but fights over K Street lobbying slots for ones friends or enemies is not exactly the same thing. The Bush administration largely refused to listen to environmentals on his energy policy-- there's no constitutional violation in that, just a reason for voters to throw him out of office Frankly, I hope Delay and Norquist succeed in killing jobs for all liberals trying to get positions flacking for the various DC business lobbies. It just gives those lobbies too much credibility with Democratic lawmakers. Posted by: Nathan at August 4, 2002 06:41 PM Dubya is going to CA to raise money for Simon (according to FOX News today), says Simon has "assured" him that he is "innocent." Is this surprising to anyone considering the Bush Crime Family's own legacy? Dubya not only overlooks corporate crime, he endorses and embraces it. Posted by: annie_ohhhhh at August 23, 2002 01:04 PM pissing Posted by: roma at August 24, 2004 04:12 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|