|
|
<< Do Filibuster Rules Survive from last Senate? | Main | What is a Front? WWP & ANSWER >> January 15, 2003End of Tax Cut PoliticsOn yesterday's CNN Inside Politics, Bill Schneider outlined why Bush's plan is going over like a lead baloon (here's the transcript): SCHNEIDER: Republicans rely on the fact that tax resentment has been high in this country for decades. Back in 1962, that's 40 years ago, 48 percent of Americans said they thought their federal income taxes were too high. In the mid 1960s, that number shot up to a majority and it stayed high for decades. As recently as April, 2001, nearly two-thirds of Americans said their federal income taxes were too high.Now, I grant that 911 no doubt played a role in making people willing to recognize they need to pay for what government provides, but I think Schneider is falling into dangerous territory when he cites the fact that average tax burdens have fallen only slightly. As I've argued, the expansion of child tax credits in 1997 and 2001 has eliminated income taxes for almost a majority of families-- a trap the GOP has created for themselves as they find they can't go back to the tax cut well to politically rope in those folks. As Ramesh Ponnuru of the National Review bemoaned in 2001, conservatives "take people off the tax rolls and fund social programs, heedless of the long-run political consequences of making government services seem free of charge." This of course ignores the burden of payroll taxes, but the basic truth here should give progressives more confidence in just opposing this tax cut and calling for more spending on health care and other public goods. The majority of Americans don't feel overtaxed, but they sure as hell aren't happy with our health care system. That's where opposition to Bush needs to be, not just cute minor tax plan alternatives. Posted by Nathan at January 15, 2003 09:35 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsSo where can one find a graph depicting the distribution of the burden of ALL* taxes, not just the income tax. Federal: States and Localities I suspect that an honest (readable) presentation would show that in total, the more you make the less you pay as a percentage of your income and/or your net worth.
Posted by: Tom Strong at January 15, 2003 12:31 PM Probably not quite, but it's pretty weak on the progressive side. But check out the new study on the regressivity of state taxes here. Posted by: Nathan Newman at January 15, 2003 12:51 PM 1) Wealth appreciation, however, is probably far more important w/r/t equity, harder to measure, and taxed only erratically and lightly when at all. (capital gains) 2) It's worth noting that the rise and decline of the tax backlash was concomittant with the rise and decline of the racial backlash movement. Not that it's over, but I do think working class white racism is lower, and hate to admit it, but "welfare reform" probably played a roll. Unfortunately, Bubba and Kaus were wrong: decline in animus has not enabled the left to put forth governmental solutions to societal problems. A terrible waste of a real opportunity. Posted by: Jeff at January 17, 2003 03:28 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|