|
|
<< Why Recall Will Improve California | Main | Lies That Kill >> August 08, 2003Why Won't Progressives Give Credit to Unions?A range of unions, environmental, women's organizations and rich guys have created a broad umbrella organization to turn out the vote next year, with the goal of spending $75 million. George Soros is throwing $10 million into the effort, which is all to the good, but KOS therefore credits him with having "pulled together" the coalition, when these coalition funding vehicles have been in formation for over a year. This is on top of the multi-union progressive vehicles that were approved at the recent AFL-CIO meeting. Unions will be spending hundreds of millions of dollars in next year's election, yet they rarely get credit for bankrolling and turning out volunteers to make progressive electoral victories possible. Give Soros his kudos-- but hell, he can spare the money. How about a few more hurrahs for the working janitors at SEIU contributing to knock Bush out of office? I don't mean to slam Kos specifically, since he does detail union activity reasonably often, but there is a general taking for granted that most progressive election funds come from union members. It's nice when previously depolitical professionals throw some bucks to a Dean candidacy or a Soros dumps some cash in, but the expanded union investments in this election are going to end up being far more important to ousting Bush next year. Posted by Nathan at August 8, 2003 11:54 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsI know that your a huge union guy and I think in general you are right too many people don't give the unions enough credit ... I for one like my weekend. But instead of simply yelling at them you might want to examine the reasons not just yell at a bunch fo people who aren't pofessional polls: 1) Unions are less relevant in people's daily lives. The SEIU has not unionized enough of the new job growth to make sure that unions touch every persons lives. 2) Unions have been electorally predictable for this election cycle. Endorsement after endorsement for Gephardt was expected and less relevant to most of the activists. Now that polling shows among union members Dean outpolls Gephardt continues this problem. 3) People like you give them too much credit. If they were so effective then why did we lose congress and the senate? They are slow moving as all large membership organizations are. I know for a fact that EMILY's List and NARAL dragged the Unions back into ACT after a couple fistfights. In end the end it was a decision of relevance not one of progressive causes. 4) Finally, to say that Soros doesn't matter because he is the money is downright stupid. Soros has been giving money to progressive organizations for the past 20 years and is committing even more than the $10 million. There are rumors he has committed to match Gerorge Bush's fundraising. $200 million is not something to scoff at. Neither is $10 million. Giving him press is great so he doesn't spend that money in russia. 5) Finally, something to remember for partisians like me - Unions endorse republicans. Unions are out for themselves, pure and simple, if it was any other way then they'd be doing their union a dis-service. So I have fought the AFL-CIO in many elections and worked with them on others. I cannot see them in the same light as my volunteers who show up for every election. I am not saying these are great reasons .... or justify an ignorance of unions. But instead shows some fo the reasons people I know don't credit them as they should. However, you can't just expect someone to get scolded and realize the light. They'll have to work side-by-side with the unions in an election to appreciate their work. They will this year, so wait ... settle down. Posted by: Kevin Thurman at August 8, 2003 01:08 PM Kevin, You make some good points. However, one reason unions are not as effective as they once were, is that so many manufacturing jobs have fled this country, in no small part to NAFTA and other so-called free-trade agreements. I don't have any data on this, but I would imagine traditional union jobs are shrinking. Unions are out for themselves, as they should be. Lucky for most Americans, their agenda has largely been to improve working conditions and wages. I don't doubt that they have sometimes endorsed Republicans, as many democrats have voted republican as well. I appreciate Nathan's point, in that Soros would be fighting a very lonely battle without their support. I think they will prove to be extremely important to this election. Posted by: elizabeth at August 8, 2003 02:52 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|