|
|
<< The Next Seattle-style Protest | Main | Labor Day Monday >> September 01, 2003Carolina GOPers Zap BushLast week I noted the rise of Perot-like anti-trade sentiments in the Carolinas that was turning a lot of former Republcians against Bush as plants shutdown and move overseas. The reaction has been swift. Here is one op-ed by a Republican Congressperson, Sue Myrick, who voted for fast-track authority but is now distancing herself from Bush: However, what good are trade agreements if the administration is not going to enforce them? Many members of Congress went to the mat to vote for "free trade" bills advocated by the administration. Is it too much to ask them to now enforce those bills?When people in a President's own party start publicly denouncing you in hometown papers, you know they're in trouble. Posted by Nathan at September 1, 2003 07:39 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsNote the deflection of blame to "Asians," though. I mean, it wouldn't be possible for true-blue Americans to actually profiteer off of Asian workers? None of that stuff that appears on our docks could possibly be marked up to a point just below what American industry can compete at, could it? Because, when you think of how little Asian production costs, and how low-cost countries have shown very little ability to get traction towards the higher living standards that the demand for their products would seem to predict,* then.. Well, it make you wonder if a very few at the top were actually making as much or more money off imports than the Asians themselves?? But that couldn't be, the rich are the bestest Americans ever, ask the Heritage Foundation. Anyway, it isn't happening because if that were true we'd be seeing a growing wealth gap between the "Investor Class" and the people who still depend on paychecks. Oh...umm...OK, well we'd ALSO see the non-investors going deeper into debt and even bankruptcy(because at the final limit they will not be able to trade stuff back, so savings are all they have) and we don't see.. oops, well... Hey, did you know the Redskins franchise is worth just short of a billion dollars? No wonder we're the envy of the world. *Except for Japan and anyone who ignores the IMF Posted by: a different chris at September 1, 2003 04:13 PM So then what's the answer for the American worker? I mean besides launching a campaign to ensure that the only corp./Conglomerates that get both federal and state contracts are those that do employ US workers what other options are there? End off shore incorporation in Bimini and St. Croix would be another. But what else? John Jimenez http://gore2004.meetup.com/ Posted by: Shadow-Eyes at September 1, 2003 05:37 PM The short answer is not protectionism but supporting labor rights globally in trade deals. As long as workers are receiving the full value of their labor, they'll be buying enough goods from each other to make everyone better off. The problem is that the wealthy in all countries -- from the US to China -- have been getting richer at the expense of the poorest in each country. This is not a situation of countries exploiting each other, but of people at the top exploiting those at the bottom everywhere. Posted by: Nathan at September 1, 2003 07:30 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|