|
<< NCLR Blasts Bush Immigration Proposal | Main | Mexican Opposition Denounces Bush-Fox Immigration Plan >> January 12, 2004The O'Neill "Revelations": What is New?Okay, what's new is that a former Cabinet member is saying that Bush is a liar and completely directed by political imperatives, as this Time magazine article details: So, what does O'Neill reveal? According to the book, ideology and electoral politics so dominated the domestic-policy process during his tenure that it was often impossible to have a rational exchange of ideas. The incurious President was so opaque on some important issues that top Cabinet officials were left guessing his mind even after face-to-face meetings.But for those who read the Esquire story featuring ex-Bush aide, John DiIulio, this all sounds familiar. From that July 2002 story: "There is no precedent in any modern White House for what is going on in this one: a complete lack of a policy apparatus," DiIulio tells Esquire. "What you've got is everything—and I mean everything—being run by the political arm. It's the reign of the Mayberry Machiavellis."Everything, from bombing Iraq to passing the Medicare bill, is driven by politics and reelection. This is why even many conservatives have begun to despise this administration, since they are so completely devoid of principle. They'll yack about fiscal responsibility while running $500 billion deficits, bemoan the costs of entitlements while dishing out Medicare money to the pharmaceutical industry, and posture on ethics while cutting sweetheart contract deals for Halliburton. These are evil, unprincipled people folks. And worse for the American people, they just don't give a crap whether you have a job or not. Posted by Nathan at January 12, 2004 04:22 PM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThe initial headlines about O'Neill's revelations focused on the already-known-fact that Bush's administration started trying to find a way to go to war in Iraq as soon as they took office in 2001. Thanks for highlighting what I think is the more interesting part of O'Neill's story: that George W. Bush is obsessed with electoral politics and maintaining power and not really interested in policy. Ever since I read the descriptions of how George W. Bush's role in his father's failed 1992 re-election bid, and his vow not to repeat the mistakes of that campaign, I've known that first and foremost, George W. Bush is a political animal. The White House wants Americans to think he is "a decisive leader" who doesn't read the news because it is full of blathering opinion. The stories this week all point to the truth that Bush doesn't really care about the policy decisions all that much -- unless they will win or cost him and his party votes in the upcoming elections. One wonders if he even is a true believer in the neoconservative vision of spreading American influence through war, or if instead, what sold him on the war was the belief that it would raise his popularity in ways nothing else could. Thus far, the war is really the only thing he's been able to do to prop up his presidency. (His popularity following 9/11 was not his own doing.) War in Iraq helped his father -- temporarily. We shall see if he's able to ride the wave longer than his Dad did. In the end, I hope Americans come to see that George W. Bush is not a "decisive leader" but merely a clever, calculating politico who gets by by helping his friends. Posted by: John McCrory at January 12, 2004 05:05 PM I think the comments from O'Neill are much more damaging - they are specific, eloquent, and they're getting national press. O'Neill is (or at least, was) a respected leader in corporate America, and he's been with the party a long time. It will be interesting to see how Bush deals with this over time... for my part, I'm headed out to pick up the book, which comes out today! Posted by: paul at January 13, 2004 09:49 AM I said December of 2002 that Bush was the biggest power slut I can remember as president. By power slut I mean one who uses power to get more power without reaching any ultimate end except even more power. Having said this it is important to keep in mind that Bush is not clever nihilst. The simplicity of his mind (his IQ is 115) makes this impossible; it also makes it impossible for him to judge an issue much beyond how the common simpleton judges the issue; and paradoxically this means in a Democracy Bush will act exactly like a the clever nihilist except with more genuineness. Posted by: Wacko Jacko at January 15, 2004 01:50 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|