|
<< Trade: Corporate & Labor Rights | Main | Brits to Leave If Asked by Shias >> April 18, 2004Why Detroit Likes Gas TaxesBush is running ads that bash Kerry for voting for a proposal that would have raised the gas tax by 50 cents a gallon: "Some people have wacky ideas, like taxing gasoline more so people drive less."Yeah, some people. Like the CEO and Chairman of Ford Motor Company: "Anything that can align the individual customer's purchase decisions with society's goals are the way to go," Ford's chairman and chief executive, William Clay Ford Jr., said, adding that his company has previously supported a 50-cent increase in gas taxes.And the head of General Motors: "If you want people to consume something less, the simplest thing to do is price it more dearly," [Chairman and chief executive of G.M] Mr. Wagoner said.Detroit likes gas taxes better than fuel economy standards. And Detroit is right. It makes little sense in the abstract to tell Detroit to make cars that average a certain efficiency-- if some customers want gas guzzlers, it just encourages tricks (like the SUV exception) to evade the averages. Of course, Detroit leaders can talk about gas taxes because they know they won't pass Congress, so it's easy for them to promote the best solution (that won't pass) in hopes of derailing a useful-but-not-as-good solution like fuel efficiency standards. But when Bush attacks gas taxes, let's remember that he's anti-business and trying to undermine the auto industry. At least that's what Detroit's auto executives seem to be saying. Posted by Nathan at April 18, 2004 09:21 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsEver notice how this administration is in favor of market forces unless it inconveniences them directly? For example, the Kansas farmer who wants to test all his cattle for BSE so he can sell to Japan is being thwarted by the Department of Agriculture. Bidding on governmnet contracts is required unless Administration buddies can supply said services for extortionate amounts. Corrupt. Scorpio Posted by: Scorpio at April 18, 2004 11:17 AM There's no such thing as a perfectly free market or whatever, but every time you use public policy to change the shape of the market, it costs someone something. Detroit's support of the gas tax makes sure that in the event the government enforces fuel conservation, it's not Detroit that pays. It's you the consumer who pays. This may lead you to be willing to foot the bill for the development and introduction of fuel-efficient vehicles, but unlike government-enforced efficiency standards, such a turn of events allows carmakers to recoup their investment into fuel efficiency, rather than having to write it off as a sunk cost of doing business. It may be true that a gas tax is more effective than efficiency standards, but that's not why carmakers support it. Posted by: Melissa O at April 19, 2004 08:31 PM Gas taxes are both more efficient from an economic perspective and considerably regressive, which is of course why Kerry's proposal would have been offset by a cut in payroll taxes. Why not, instead of CAFE, simply tax car sales on the basis of fuel economy? This is starting to happen with tax credits for hybrids, but why not also increase taxes on Hummers and SUVs? Sure, Detroit would still pass the taxes directly onto consumers, but at least the consumers would be paying for their inefficient vehicles up front, and low-income consumers could simply buy more efficient cars. And Detroit would be pushed into making more efficient cars, because people would be aware of the higher costs at the point of sale, and would gravitate toward greater fuel economy. --marco Posted by: marco at April 22, 2004 05:30 PM Sheesh, Nathan, thinking of running for office yourself and practicing your quoting-out-of-context? Neither of those executives endorsed an increased gas tax; they merely prefer it to raising CAFE. Posted by: David Nieporent at April 24, 2004 09:04 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|