|
<< Conservatives Should Support Israel Wall Decision | Main | Labor Organizing Non-Union Population >> July 10, 2004NRA vs. HuntersThe National Rifle Association's blind GOP partisanship is now putting it increasingly at odds with its own members, particularly hunters and other outdoors sportspeople who depend on wild habitat-- habitat that the GOP increasingly supports destroying in favor of the interests of big business. Highlighting the clash is the NRA's denunciation of the Sierra Club at a recent convention of the Outdoor Writers of America, a pro-hunting journalism group that is normally an NRA ally. But after this NRA attack on the Sierra Club, the board of directors sents a letter denouncing the NRA's attack. As the article notes, the NRA is supporting the Bush administration's regulations that have undermined Clinton-era regulations to limits road construction on federal land. Yet studies by hunting and fishing groups show such roadless areas are the best places for outdoor sportsmen: The Bush and Kerry campaigns are courting hunters and anglers, whose numbers are large in swing states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania and who tend to turn out to vote. In the 2000 election, the "hook and bullet" vote went mostly to George W. Bush and gun rights were a decisive factor, according to several major hunting and conservation groups. But according to these same organizations, resource extraction efforts by the Bush administration on prime hunting and fishing habitat have upset many outdoorsmen...Kerry and Edwards, if they highlight their environmental positions, can campaign as better friends of most gun owners than the NRA-- a direct foray into the rural voting strongholds of the GOP. Posted by Nathan at July 10, 2004 08:13 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: Comments...exactly as Howard Dean suggested, and was condemned for. You'll remember he made common cause with the NRA to protect the "Champion lands" in Vermont, so named because they'd been owned by that lumber company. And he bragged of it on the campaign trail. Yes sir, another target of opportunity. How many Howard Dean has brought us. Health care. Iraq. Pride in being Democrats. Civil Unions as a compromise in the culture wars. And, of course, uniting with gun owners on conservation to de-fang the NRA. Whatever happened to him...and why are Kerry-Edwards running away from him so hard? I'd feel a lot better if those two would embrace the John The Baptist who made them possible. Posted by: Dana Blankenhorn at July 10, 2004 07:03 PM This should come as no suprise. Hunters are very pro-environment. They also use rifles, not handguns. Posted by: fasteddie at July 12, 2004 05:48 PM The NRA stopped being the National Rifle Association long ago. Now they're the National "a piece in every whacko's pocket" Society. Posted by: wvmcl at July 13, 2004 02:51 PM Hunters also use handguns, that's a misconception - and in any case, the second amendment doesn't say "The right to bear hunting arms". Posted by: Jeff Lawson at July 20, 2004 01:53 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|