|
<< Religious Right Loses | Main | Arnie, the Tribes & the Unions >> June 23, 2004More on Stern Labor SpeechIf you read the text of Andy Stern's speech at the SEIU National Convention, the vision he lays out for remaking the labor movement is somewhat breathtaking in its sweep. He starts with calls to continue remaking over SEIU itself into a union that can negotiate nationally against its corporate opponents: For SEIU’s first 60 years the responsibility to change our member’s lives depended almost entirely on local unions...Stern next turned to discussing how the union can help remake the larger labor movement, especially the AFL-CIO:
Next June, the AFLCIO will celebrate its 50th anniversary. At the time it was established, one out of three workers in the U.S. was in a union...Today, with only 1 in 12 workers in the private sector in unions and less than 1 in 8 workers in unions overall, non-union wages in companies like WalMart are dragging everyone down.The latter alternative is reference to the New Unity Partnership that Stern and a number of other unions have been talking about building to support multi-union organizing campaigns. But then Stern takes his vision to the whole world, discussing how the union movement needs to go global to take on global multinationals: Today’s global corporations have no permanent home, recognize no national borders, and salute no flag but their own corporate logo and take their money to anywhere where they can make the most – and pay the least.As for Wal-Mart itself, Stern called for a new unity between the labor movement and non-union workers and community members presently without a union contract: As for WalMart, at this Convention I am asking you to help create a new global campaign—WalMart. No Bargain! that explains to the world that WalMart’s low prices cost too much - they cost workers too much, and small businesses, communities, and nations too much...And of course in an election, he raised new initiatives to build political power for union members: This year, our purple political army led by two thousand and four fulltime "Heroes" backed up by 50,000 purple volunteers is the largest mobilization by any single organization in the history of American politics...At the end of the speech, Stern then evokes the oldest rhetoric of the labor movement, paraphrasing Solidarity Forever plus a bit of a Kennedyesque challenge: We can bring to earth a new world from the ashes of the old because our union transforms us the powerless into the powerful. And I ask you to join together in using all that power – all that strength to make the dreams of all workers and communities around the world come true.This is a speech by the leader of one of the largest membership-run institutions in the world, an organization that spends hundreds of millions of dollars each year organizing. For anyone concerned about social change, it's worth paying attention. Posted by Nathan at June 23, 2004 05:25 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThis is certainly a grand vision. I especially like his vision of bringing unions global. It is the only way to compete against the global corporations. I think though, China is going to be problematic. This is still a COMMUNIST country whose leadership professed goal is continued suppression of its citizens, especially in the area of labor rights. Posted by: SlcINcny at June 23, 2004 07:56 AM Stern certainly is a big thinker, and his ideas merit serious discussion. But I still don't know if the consolidation, raiding, and potential erosion of democracy proposed by NUP is the answer to all of labor's problems. For example, the NUP prescription seems to me to be largely inappropriate to the building trades. That said, at least Stern and the SEIU are trying something new. Posted by: Trapper John at June 23, 2004 05:14 PM Nathan, I caught Meyerson's great piece this morning, too. Follow the link for my thoughts. Posted by: Melanie at June 23, 2004 07:08 PM Stern's parahrasing "Solidarity Forever" not "The Internationale", by the way. I am sympathetic to Stern's views on restructuring the union movement, however, it seems long on vision and short on specifics. I have no idea how to persuade dozens of small unions lead by turf-conscious bureaucrats to consolidate. It will be interesting to watch I think the web site/virtual unionism thing really amounts to a way to harvest lots of e-mail addresses for SEIU political campaigns. A good idea, but lets not over-hype it. Posted by: aenglish at June 23, 2004 10:43 PM Andy-- Absolutely right. Shame on me. As for Andy's specifics-- we'll see what he does. There is a simple way to force the turf-conscious bureaucrats to consolidate. Threaten to start raiding their jurisdictions. It's worth remembering that one of the principle results of the CIO splitting off from the AFL in the 1930s was not just a burst of new CIO organizing. Under threat of CIO raiding their turf, the AFL starting organizing like mad and actually added more members than the CIO did, if I remember my history. Posted by: Nathan at June 23, 2004 10:52 PM If raiding is the answer, than the SEIU and other NUP unions will have to follow the Carpenters out of the AFLCIO. And SEIU's current jurisdictions also become fair game for other unions. That would be a big step. Frankly I don't like the idea of unions spending member's money on decerts and slinging mud against one another. Let's hope it doesn't come to that. Posted by: aenglish at June 24, 2004 04:20 PM Andy- I actually doubt it comes to that-- and it's not like raiding and jurisdiction fights don't happen all the time in SEIU's public services and health care areas. One of Stern's complaints is that jurisdictions are too weak now. All sorts of unions organize "anything that moves" without any industry strategy and often divided unions within the same industry. But I hope that the very threat of secession will lead to a better set of rules and coordination within the AFL-CIO. Posted by: Nathan Newman at June 24, 2004 04:33 PM Meyerson notes:
Well the workers had never been told that they had a union. They didn't. They were paying dues out of their paychecks to help their employer stay union free. And the Longshoremen were taking the pay off. In that case, raiding was the only responsible thing to do. The labor movement owed those workers the union that they had been paying for. That's an extreme example, but when uber-democracy advocates complain that consolidation will rob union members of their local traditions. At best those traditions amount to organizing a weekend of golf to raise money for the United Way. More often the main tradition is concession bargaining. I would guess that at least half of union members in this country thick their union isn't worth a s%$^ but it's better than nothing. I talk to them all the time. I don't think that's the case for most SEIU members. I think that consolidation is going to get ugly. But it has to happen.
Posted by: Marc Brazeau at June 25, 2004 11:58 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|