|
<< Barbie Loses/Public Wins | Main | Bush Fights Cheap AIDS Drugs >> June 30, 2004SEIU Endorses Gay MarriageOnce upon a time, the Democrats were described as a party divided between culturally conservative unions versus McGovernite cultural liberals. Well, that's pretty much over. At its national executive board meeting, SEIU took a strong leadership role by endorsing gay marriage in tough language: We recognize that lack of access to marriage deprives gay and lesbian working families of more than 1,000 rights and benefits afforded heterosexual families, such as spousal Social Security and pension benefits, hospital visitation rights, spousal health insurance, immigration rights, and many other federal, state, and local protections, as well as rights in the workplace.It's worth emphasizing that the progressive coalition is not tied together merely by hating Bush and the Right. They share a broad-based set of values and mutual respect for a range of policies. It is the rightwing-- encompassing culturally liberal corporate types versus populist religious evangelicals -- that are united only by fear and hatred of the Left. Posted by Nathan at June 30, 2004 05:47 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsWe can only hope that the rest of the AFL-CIO unions will jump on soon. My bet for next to join? Why, the new UNITE-HERE of course. (Seeing as they're the other progressive union.) ravenastro Posted by: ravenastro at July 1, 2004 01:29 PM You would expect a union not to support benefits for its membership? The question is rather why others are hesitant--on both sides. As even the Antichrist who runs the Evil Empire (Michael Eisner/Disney) knows, benefits for same-sex and domestic partners allows you to draw from A LARGER group of possible employees. It's good for business. Posted by: Ken Houghton at July 1, 2004 02:59 PM As revenastro alluded to, the SEIU is one of the most progressive unions in the AFL-CIO family. They have a much more progressive membership base than many other affiliates. For example, the Building and Construction Trades, made up of such unions as the IBEW, the Plumbers and Pipefitters, and the Ironworkers, have a much more conservative (socially and economically) membership base than the SEIU. The far right has long pushed issues like guns and abortion to drive a wedge between conservative union members' hearts and pocketbooks. Gay marriage is just the GOP's latest effort to entice working people to vote against their own self interest. From the teamsters, electrical workers, and fire fighters I talk to - it's working. If Bush were at all competent, he would be able to get the same 40% of those union members' votes that Republicans get here in Michigan. Thank God he's not. Posted by: T.T. Badmitten at July 1, 2004 05:31 PM Why did you feel the need to end a perfectly good post about the unity of the left wing with a dig at the right? I ask not because I'm defending either "corporate types" or "religious evangelicals," but rather because I think the fact that you felt the need to go there demonstrates a problem within politics today: the inability to advance a positive policy without taking every possible opportunity to turn it into an us vs. them invective. Most people are neither hard rightists nor liberals, and neither side is going to win many points, even if their arguments are as good as the argument in favor of equal marriage rights, if they persist in turning everything into an attack. This is the reason that mainstream politics, quite frankly, makes me feel dirty. Posted by: Amy Phillips at July 1, 2004 05:48 PM It takes someone to put a motion on the floor at a union meeting. Not many guys are willing to stand up in front of everyone and make a motion to endorse same-sex marriage. In fact, not many industrial unions passed resolutions against the Iraq war. (I believe the Teamsters Local in Chicago passed an anti-war resolution.) The point I'm trying to make in this post is that it takes a lot of courage to stand up for issues that don't really concern the day-to-day life of a Teamster or Carpenter. Posted by: Doug at July 1, 2004 10:03 PM Here in Boston, IBEW local 103 is the only union to go out of their way to announce that they plan to DENY benefits to same-sex couples who are LEGALLY MARRIED. I have a couple friends in that local and they insist this has nothing to do with the rank and file, just a few bad apples at the top of the stack. I don't know, though... Also, BTW, when the cop union was picketing at the convention site a couple weeks ago, they (and solidarity picketers) were calling people crossing the line "faggots" a whole lot. Not that I have any sympathy with people who cross the line... Simultaneously the cops physically pushed young, radical people who showed up for to participate in the solidarity picket OUT of the line and let them know their solidarity wasn't welcome. So don't forget that it cuts both ways, that not all is hunky dory with the "progressive coalition", that some unions are holding social positions to the right of the state. Not everyone is the SEIU. Posted by: mj at July 2, 2004 10:40 AM If you look on the Pride At Work website- quite a few labor unions have passed anti- Federal Marriage Amendment resolutions- from OPEIU to the United Farmworkers Union. The marriage equality resolution was a great move forward in this arena- and makes me hopeful that the AFL Exec Council will pass a formal anti-FMA resolution at their August meeting. Also- shameless plug here- you can send a free fax to your senators around FMA by going to http://www.unionvoice.org/campaign/fma . Thanks jb Posted by: Jeremy at July 7, 2004 09:52 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|