|
<< Yale on Strike | Main | Why Job Losses from Min Wage Don't Matter >> August 28, 2003Faux News Smears BustamanteFOXNews has jumped on the anti-MEChA bandwagon to smear Bustamante. Here you have conservatives saying that folks like Strom Thurmond or nominated Appeals Court Bill Pickering, who voted for a range of racist laws and worked closely with real racist groups like the "Mississippi Sovereignty Commission," shouldn't have their past disqualify them from office, then turn around and slime Bustamante for being a member of a mainstream student group like MEChA. Just look at the Lying Lies Used by Liars in the Fox News story above. See the phrases like "members of the group" or have been "associated" with some other group, or the random quoting of documents out of context. The rightwing machine is in full play, first to mount the recall, now to slime Bustamante-- a Democrat so moderate he's endorsed Lieberman for god's sake. It's just more Big Lies. Let's look at the mission of MEChA as stated by actual MEChA chapters, as opposed to the lies of its enemies. Nowhere is racism of any kind towards other groups advocated, nor the rightwing boogie-man of armed separatism or any such rightwing smears. No doubt there were individual members within MEChA way back who used such language, but for the organization as a whole, the idea of self-determination has been one of educational uplift within a multicultural country, as American a goal as apple pie. Anyone who has worked with MEChA students -- as I have -- can tell you they are committed to multi-racial organizing and respect towards people of all races, genders, and sexual orientation. They are a hell of a lot more tolerant and supportive of diversity than any of their critics. Update: A good article in the Arizona Republic emphasizing how radical this assault is on Bustamante, since it is really an attempt to destroy almost every existing latino politician through this smear. As this columnist notes: Among the prominent MEChistas hereabouts is John Loredo, the current Arizona House minority leader. I wouldn't be surprised if most Latino political leaders nationwide were MECHistas.This fight is now about a lot more than Bustamante; it's about defending a whole generation of latino leadership from the rightwing wurlitzer. Update: See GOP: Repudiate YAF for more on conservative hypocrisy on racism and Bustamante. And here documenting lies in the Fox report. Posted by Nathan at August 28, 2003 10:48 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThe FOX story uses a radio talk show host as an authoritative source! Posted by: Dave Johnson at August 28, 2003 05:59 PM David Neiwert was also posting about this a week or so ago and pretty well debunked the whole claim about MEChA Posted by: Al-Muhajabah at August 28, 2003 09:39 PM I found this on three of the four websites I was able to view... you don't consider this racist? "Aztlán belongs to those who plant the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign Europeans. We do not recognize capricious frontiers on the bronze continent." Posted by: Ed Brown at August 29, 2003 12:27 AM Actually, I think most Americans would agree that "foreign Europeans" are not welcome. Do "Freedom Fries" ring a bell? Posted by: JimTXDem at August 29, 2003 04:59 PM Good one JimTX :) Posted by: Nathan Newman at August 29, 2003 05:07 PM This week's New Republic reports that Bustamante used the "n" word [actually, it just says racial slur, but the rest of the context strongly suggests it was the "n" word] in a speech to a group of black trade unionists. Any truth to this, you think? Any comments? Posted by: Fragen at August 30, 2003 06:18 PM Fragen-- It's absolutely true- he was speaking to the Coalition of Black Trade Unionists and when he meant to talk about the history of establishing the Negro Labor Congress, he said N------ Labor Congress. He realized his mistake and apologized. And continued to apologize. See here for the story. Does that show some personal prejudice on Bustamante's part, even an indication he was reaching back to a youth when he might have used the word on the streets? Probably. Bustamante was poor and language is rougher than in the well-educated bastions of white gated communities where racism is done, not spoken. The point is that Bustamante apologized immediately and profusely. He is not perfect in his soul but recognized his own failing. Few people are immune from personal prejudice. The question is, especially for politicians, whether they overcome it and enact public policy to address the social results of individual prejucide. And Bustamante has a long history of this. Posted by: Nathan at August 30, 2003 07:05 PM Agreed. Good one JimTX! Posted by: kemetstar at August 30, 2003 08:22 PM So, Jesse Jackson's "Hymie Town" comment was, er, kosher? Yes, we all make mistakes but the nature of the mistakes is telling. Reminds me a bit of the senator who referred to Barney Frank as "Barney Fag" and then said it was a mispronunciation. I'm really not casting stones, but I would be loathe to support someone who made the "n" mistake. Do read the New Republic piece if you get a chance. I don't have a dog in this fight, nor I am likely to adopt the NR's positions on many issues, but it it did make a compelling case that Bustamante is, at best, underwhelming. Posted by: Fragen at August 31, 2003 01:43 AM Actually, MEChA-Man didn't apologize until after he'd finished his speech, by which time roughly 100 of the 400 in attendance had left in disgust. The real point is not whether or when he apologized for the slur, but rather, what possessed him to utter it in the first place. As with Dick Armey's infamous reference to "Barney Fag," the most logical explanation is that he accidentally said it once in public because he routinely says it on purpose private. Posted by: Xrlq at September 10, 2003 02:29 PM Actually, MEChA-Man didn't apologize until after he'd finished his speech, by which time roughly 100 of the 400 in attendance had left in disgust. The real point is not whether or when he apologized for the slur, but rather, what possessed him to utter it in the first place. As with Dick Armey's infamous reference to "Barney Fag," the most logical explanation is that he accidentally said it once in public because he routinely says it on purpose in private. Posted by: Xrlq at September 10, 2003 02:29 PM "Good one JimTX :)" Yeah, good one. But, all laughing aside, could you please explain the difference between the statement "Aztlán [doesn't belong] to the foreign Europeans" and, say, the statement "Juden 'raus?" Is there any difference at all? This page might help understand MEChA. Note the URL. Posted by: Lonewacko: I Blogged Across America. Twice. at December 23, 2003 04:05 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|