|
|
<< Myth of Declining Voter Turnout | Main | Is Dean's Organization Irrelevent? >> January 19, 2004Congrats to KerryYou gotta love politics-- there are always surprises, especially in multi-candidate primary races. Kerry's big win doesn't make me unhappy-- I supported Dean largely because Kerry made such a hash of his campaign, but if Kerry can fight through the rest of the nomination race and win, it will demonstrate his mettle to take on Bush. It's sad for my political prediction cred that I abandoned my original hard prediction for a Kerry win back in May, which I supplemented with this analysis in June that Kerry, as the second choice of most Dem voters, would win out in the end: That is a base of latent support on the left that he can supplement with latent support from more conservative Democrats. What this means is that which ever candidates fade as the campaign moves forward, Kerry will be able to pick up votes across the spectrum. Which will be the recipe for his likely nomination at the end of the day.When Kerry seemed to collapse, I really didn't think anyone else could beat Dean, but if it really comes down to a Dean-Kerry fight (what I originally thought would be the configuration), all bets are off. Dean still is sitting on a hell of a lot of money and his Internet-driven organization across the country. Kerry can't replicate the throwing-everything-he-has-at-Iowa strategy (a brilliant move as it turned out for someone everyone thought would bet on New Hampshire)-- so he has to raise a lot of money quick to compete in followup states. I've been pretty agnostic on ultimate desires on this nomination, since I actually like almost all the major candidates, and Dean and Kerry are at the top of my list. Wesley Clark and Gephardt are the biggest losers tonight, which suits me fine. [BTW before the "weakness of organized labor" line takes off, also remember that all of the candidates have stellar labor records and John Edwards is a chief Senate sponsor of new pro-labor legislation. In small ornery states like Iowa, mere endorsement won't push folks to choose between multiple pro-labor candidates, but the real force of labor in this race is how strongly all candidates came out for strong new pro-labor legislation.] Ignore the Anti-Kerry Meme: We will soon see the "Dean is McGovern" meme replaced with the "Kerry is Dukakis" line. Just some reminders of why Kerry could never be mistaken for the cautious, wonkish Dukakis (aside from his military record), check out this post on his investigation of the CIA-drugs-Contra connection where he almost single-handedly dogged the Reagan and Bush administration when the rest of the Democrats had slunk away after the Ollie North hearings: Washington Post, November 27, 1986So don't buy any media line of Kerry as some cautious, blow-dried wonk. No one in the Senate has more experience dealing with terrorists, including those funded by the US through drug dollars down in Central America. Posted by Nathan at January 19, 2004 08:40 PM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsThis race suddenly got very, very interesting, especially if Dean wins New Hampshire. Picture this: Kerry won Iowa. Overall, I put the chances of nomination like this: 1. Kerry Posted by: wollop at January 20, 2004 01:59 AM Kerry victory means Democrats lose in the fall. Posted by: cosmic grappler at January 20, 2004 05:36 AM Dean's silly concession speech did him no good, at least in my eyes. Let's see if he can put himself back together. Re the electability meme, it's important to remember that all of the Dems would face a sh*tstorm of bad press (except maybe Lieberman, who unfortunately won't sufficiently rouse the troops to beat Bush) and mean campaigning from Rove. In other words, Kerry, Edwards and Clark face as tough a road as Dean would. But, unlike Dean, these other candidates so far have not been shooting themselves in the foot. Posted by: John Q at January 20, 2004 11:03 AM I CANNOT SAY HOW HAPPY I AM !! I have been a Kerry supporter all along and now he is on the move. The loss for the Dean machine proves that substance is far more important than flash. Finally, the party can address the issues head-on and not with political slickness but with the realities we face: 1) protection of the middle class tax bracket (no repeals) But Nathan, it is not because Kerry is everyone's number two, it is because he IS the best candidate who can close the gap for voters between Bush (disastrous policies) and Clinton (what did you really get that wasn't smoke and mirrors). Kerry offers a real discussion and a real fight over medical coverage that the Clinton-Gore team did not; and that Dr. Dean, in Gore's likeness, never will. After Kerry takes New Hampshire away from Dean it is all over for the good doctor and the fight will be at Bush's front door. KERRY 2004 ALL THE WAY! Posted by: Aimie at January 21, 2004 11:31 AM Join the Linux community. Linuxwaves.net Posted by: Owen at July 6, 2004 11:33 AM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|