|
<< In Iraq, It's the Jobs, Stupid | Main | Farhenheit Sells Out >> June 25, 2004Jim Crow Comes NorthAcross the South, Jim Crow disenfranchisement continues in the form of barring ex-felony offenders from voting. Given racism in our criminal justice system, this means that blacks are disproportionately barred from voting, usually for the rest of their lives in those states. There is a strong movement to restore the vote to those ex-offenders, but in the North, we are seeing a racist campaign to bar ex-offenders from participating in election campaigns. A large hue and cry has been raised because the labor and civil rights-based group, Americans Coming Together (ACT), hired some ex-offenders to canvass door-to-door. The GOP attack machine went into effect and demanded that all the ex-offenders be fired. Unfortunately, ACT has partially given in and agreed to do background checks and refuse jobs to anyone with "violent or serious offenses." So for democracy, it's one strike and your out. No rehabilitation or serving your sentence gets you back the right to be part of our electoral system. It's just a new version of Jim Crow, except it extends up North as well. Posted by Nathan at June 25, 2004 08:34 AM Related posts:
Trackback PingsTrackBack URL for this entry: CommentsPeople could worry about giving ex-felons elaborately cross-referenced directories of names, phone numbers and addresses, and a mandate to be walking straight up to people's doors: an opportunity to look in windows, check out locks and external reinforcement, and once the door is opened, to catalog alarms, dogs, evidence of children, and valuable items within easy reach? Believe me, if Bush sent teams of ex-felons out to canvas my neighborhood, Kerry would get my vote no matter how I feel about his politics. Posted by: Matthew Dundon at June 25, 2004 12:59 PM I'm 55, and I grew up with the idea that prison was about rehabilitation. The known phrase " ... paid his debt to society ..." Posted by: RWC at June 25, 2004 03:27 PM Ironically enough, GWB made the following statement on Monday, 6/21/04: I know that many a good soul makes a mistake in their life and ends up in prison. And it seems to make sense to me to spend taxpayers' money to help these prisoners realize a better tomorrow when they get out of prison, give them a second chance. And I want that second chance to be done not only in kind of the traditional way, but also through faith--based and community--based programs. I mean, I can't--frankly, can't think of a better reentry program for somebody to be there with open arms saying, I love you, no matter what you may have done in the past. I want you to succeed, and here--and we're here to help. No howls of outrage from the "GOP attack machine" did we hear with reference to those comments, not even on GWB's purported support for new spending of "taxpayers' money" on ex-felons -- which you would think some members of the Starve the Beast crowd would have seized upon and decried. Posted by: Jamie __ at June 25, 2004 05:11 PM I am constantly appalled by the number of things ex-cons are precluded from doing here in Illinois. The one I find the most surprising is that they can't become carnies. Good lord, what else can an illiterate, emaciated, white ex-con do for a living? Posted by: Mark at June 26, 2004 02:27 AM RNC Chair Ed Gillespie, shamefully but unsurprisingly, is claiming that having been convicted of a felony should disqualify Americans from handling official documents with private information. His essential contention - that the democratic process is too pure to be sullied by the involvement of those with crimminal records - should be all too familiar to those who saw it marshalled by a slew of dKos commenters to defend Arizona's disenfranchisement of felons in the name of keeping Nader off the ballot. More power to ACT for hiring everyone who's prepared and qualified for the hard, urgent work of empowering people to make demands of our democracy. I know I've found few people as excited about that work here in Florida as those felons who've been purged from the process. Everyone (almost) claims to want to see those who've served their time productively and smoothly reintegrated into society. Except not into my neighborhood. Not into my workplace. Not into my democracy. Posted by: Josh at June 27, 2004 09:48 PM The juxtaposition with Bush's treatment of war criminals in his administration (Abrams, Negroponte) pretty much speaks for itself. I'd urge everyone who feels this way to check their local ordinances about canvassing. I canvassed for 3 years for Sane/Freeze in the Bay Area, and many communities required canvassers to carry a permit. Some places just wanted to know the names of the canvassers, others did more elaborate checks. There are some pretty paranoid communities out there, and in some cases we blew off the permits and just went out because of the intrusive screening demanded. Last point: this is just the tip of the iceberg for Bush's major effort to exterminate democracy. Every day is another step toward Putinism Posted by: NIck at June 28, 2004 11:31 AM Frankly convicts do not pay their debt back until they pay for their care in jail. Whay should I pay upwards of $40,000.00 per year so some bum can go to colledge, that is his parents job, not mine. What a bunch of phonies. Posted by: Puff Driver at July 5, 2004 12:27 PM It's just a new version of Jim Crow, except it extends up North as well. And except, you know, it applies to criminals, not black people. Posted by: David Nieporent at July 14, 2004 05:39 PM Post a comment
|
Series-
Social Security
Past Series
Current Weblog
January 04, 2005 January 03, 2005 January 02, 2005 January 01, 2005 ... and Why That's a Good Thing - Judge Richard Posner is guest blogging at Leiter Reports and has a post on why morality has to influence politics... MORE... December 31, 2004 December 30, 2004 December 29, 2004 December 28, 2004 December 24, 2004 December 22, 2004 December 21, 2004 December 20, 2004 December 18, 2004 December 17, 2004 December 16, 2004
Referrers to site
|